ArticleCureus2026
NeoProspect HER2-low: Response and Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with HER2-low Breast Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of breast cancers (BCs) are classified as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. Within this group, more than half show low levels of HER2 expression, defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with a negative result on reflex in situ hybridization. The clinical and biological relevance of this HER2-low category remains under investigation, particularly regarding response to systemic therapy.
methodsA national, multicentric, prospective, and observational study was conducted to evaluate the value of HER2-low as a predictive marker of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment in BC. Patients with HER2-low or HER2-zero (IHC 0), diagnosed at clinical stage I-III, were identified and followed throughout neoadjuvant treatment, consisting of chemotherapy ± immune checkpoint inhibitors, and subsequent surgery. Differences in subgroups and pCR were assessed using appropriate statistical tests.
resultsA total of 128 patients were included, of which 46% were HER2-low and 54% were HER2-zero, with a median age of 54 years and a median follow-up of 12 months. Within the HER2-low group, 68% patients were HER2-low 1+ and 32% were HER2-low 2+. In the HER2-low group, 71% of tumours were hormone receptor (HR) positive, and in the HER2-zero group, 67% were triple negative (TN). Tumours in the HER2-low group were more often HR-positive, postmenopausal, and had lower Ki67, while tumours in the HER2-zero group were more frequently TN, grade 3, and node-positive. Immunotherapy use was lower in HER2-low patients. Overall pCR rates were 20% in HER2-low, and 32% in HER2-zero (p=0.14), and pCR rates were lower in HR-positive compared with HR-negative tumours (12% vs. 41%). Among HER2-zero tumours, pCR was significantly lower in HR-positive than in HR-negative (9% vs. 43%; p=0.005). In HER2-low HR-positive, pCR was also lower than in the HER2-low HR-negative (14% vs. 35%; p=0.085). Within HER2-low, 23% of HER2 1+ and 16% of HER2 2+ obtained pCR. Pathological nodal response was more frequent in HER2-zero tumours (70% vs. 39%, p=0.009). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with grade ≥3 haematological toxicity being the most frequent one, without differences between the two groups.
conclusionsThis prospective real-world study suggests a trend toward lower pCR in HER2-low compared with HER2-zero tumours, although not statistically significant. The lower use of immunotherapy among HER2-low patients may have influenced these results and should be considered when interpreting comparative efficacy. The significantly reduced pCR in HR-positive compared with HR-negative disease within HER2-low tumours underscores the influence of HR status and highlights the need for careful pre-therapeutic stratification and larger, long-term studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.