ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Adherence and barriers to key antenatal interventions among pregnant women in an urban district of Ghana: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study assessed Adherence and Barriers to Key Antenatal Interventions among Pregnant Women in an Urban District of Ghana. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design to quantitatively assess the uptake and barriers to key interventions among 200 pregnant women who were selected through simple random sampling. Data was first entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet and exported to Stata version 16 in the same format. Results: The uptake of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnancy (SP-IPTp) was found to be inadequate among 48.0%, those with adequate SP-IPTp uptake, 58.34% were in their third-trimester gestation, 8.33% were in their first trimester and 85.58% of third-trimester expectant mothers had inadequate uptake of SP-IPTp. The uptake of Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation (IFAS) was high (81.5%). Barriers influencing the uptake of ANC interventions were financial constraints (62.07%), lack of permission from work (19.54%), feeling healthy and therefore not needing ANC (10.34%), and distance to the hospital (8.05%). For SP-IPTp, the leading barrier was drug unavailability at health facilities (63.71%), forgetfulness (31.82%) and adverse reactions during previous pregnancies (29.55%) were the most frequently cited barriers to IFAS uptake. For deworming therapy, 94.12% of participants reported that the medication was not administered at ANC. Conclusion: This study makes significant contributions to maternal and child health research and policy by providing empirical evidence on the gaps between the coverage and actual uptake of key antenatal care (ANC) interventions such as SP-IPTp, IFAS, and deworming therapy among pregnant women in Ghana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.