ArticleDigital health
Priorities on trauma-informed design of sexual and reproductive health-related digital technologies: A modified nominal group technique.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study brainstormed and identified key priorities for integrating trauma-informed care (TIC) principles into the design and utilization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH)-related digital technologies. Methods: We conducted a nominal group technique among interest holder groups in a large urban hospital in western Canada. The study occurred in four stages, (1) an introduction to the topic, (2) ideas generation, (3) in-person workshop, and (4) ideas ranking related to (i) SRH domains, (ii) population groups, and (iii) TIC approaches that should be prioritized in the design of health technologies. The data was analyzed using summative content analysis to produce a list of items, which were ranked and analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty people took part in this study. The findings emphasized the need to center stigmatized and emotionally sensitive SRH domains such as abortion, contraception, and STI care and called for technological design to prioritize inclusivity for marginalized groups such as 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals, migrants, sex workers, and those with low socioeconomic status. The participants proposed approaches such as customizable user interfaces, opt-in/opt-out engagement, multilingual support, content warnings, privacy controls, and survivor codesign for consideration when designing SRH digital health interventions. Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent need to integrate TIC principles into digital technologies that are used to access highly stigmatized SRH services while centering the voices of marginalized populations in the codesign process. Despite the challenges in engaging trauma survivors in codesign, the trauma-informed design approaches identified can help create safe, empowering, and healing digital spaces for people with lived experiences of trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.