ArticleDigital health
Machine learning/AI for early neonatal complication detection in rural Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study in the Sidama region.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning versus deep learning for screening ischemic stroke among asymptomatic population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal complications remain a leading cause of illness and death in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in rural areas. Early identification of high-risk neonates is crucial for timely interventions. This study assessed the incidence and determinants of neonatal complications and evaluated the predictive performance of machine learning algorithms using a unified risk framework encompassing both adverse birth outcomes and early postnatal complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected maternal and neonatal records. Five supervised machine learning models - logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were developed in R. Model performance was assessed with area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and calibration. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) identified key predictors. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of results by examining birth outcomes and postnatal complications separately. Results: Of the neonates studied, 15.2% (95% CI: 14.0-16.5) experienced complications, with higher rates in rural (17.1%) than urban areas (11.2%, Conclusion: Neonatal complications remain prevalent, with pronounced rural-urban disparities. XGBoost offers accurate and interpretable early risk prediction using routine maternal and antenatal data. Targeted interventions including expanded prenatal care, anemia management, and strengthened rural health services could reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.