ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development
The Use of Peer-Assisted Learning in Teaching Clinical Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From learners to teachers: a peer-assisted learning model in undergraduate orthopedic education: a quasi-experimental study.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a peer-assisted, simulation-based clinical skills training program in Spain: a prospective single-group before-and-after study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been increasingly adopted in undergraduate medical education as a strategy to enhance the acquisition of clinical skills. Its potential to promote collaborative learning, cost-effectiveness, and professional development makes it an attractive pedagogical approach. However, the evidence surrounding its implementation and outcomes in clinical skills teaching remains scattered. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map the extent, range, and nature of the literature on PAL in undergraduate clinical skills education. Relevant studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC from inception to 17 September 2024. Articles were included if they examined PAL interventions involving undergraduate medical students in clinical skills training. Data were extracted on study characteristics, implementation strategies, outcomes, and reported challenges. Results: A total of 95 studies met the inclusion criteria. PAL was applied across a range of clinical skills including history taking, physical examination, procedural skills, and communication training. Reported benefits included improved student confidence, enhanced skill acquisition, and positive perceptions of peer tutors and learners. Challenges included variability in tutor training, assessment methods, and sustainability of programs. Evidence gaps were noted in long-term outcomes and standardization of evaluation tools. Conclusions: PAL is a valuable educational approach for teaching clinical skills in undergraduate medical education, with benefits for both tutors and learners. Further research is needed to establish standardized frameworks, assess long-term impact, and guide integration into formal curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.