Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804333›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development

The Use of Peer-Assisted Learning in Teaching Clinical Skills in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Suhaib Mohamed Moamen, Abdulla Ismaeel Mohamed, Lynette Van Der Merwe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suhaib Mohamed MoamenMedical Skills & Simulation Unit,Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9156-5480
Abdulla Ismaeel MohamedDepartment of Surgery, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Lynette Van Der MerweDivision of Health Sciences Education, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been increasingly adopted in undergraduate medical education as a strategy to enhance the acquisition of clinical skills. Its potential to promote collaborative learning, cost-effectiveness, and professional development makes it an attractive pedagogical approach. However, the evidence surrounding its implementation and outcomes in clinical skills teaching remains scattered. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map the extent, range, and nature of the literature on PAL in undergraduate clinical skills education. Relevant studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC from inception to 17 September 2024. Articles were included if they examined PAL interventions involving undergraduate medical students in clinical skills training. Data were extracted on study characteristics, implementation strategies, outcomes, and reported challenges. Results: A total of 95 studies met the inclusion criteria. PAL was applied across a range of clinical skills including history taking, physical examination, procedural skills, and communication training. Reported benefits included improved student confidence, enhanced skill acquisition, and positive perceptions of peer tutors and learners. Challenges included variability in tutor training, assessment methods, and sustainability of programs. Evidence gaps were noted in long-term outcomes and standardization of evaluation tools. Conclusions: PAL is a valuable educational approach for teaching clinical skills in undergraduate medical education, with benefits for both tutors and learners. Further research is needed to establish standardized frameworks, assess long-term impact, and guide integration into formal curricula.

Indexed as

clinical skillsmedical curriculumPeer-assisted learningscoping reviewundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID41804333
PMCPMC12967380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.