ArticleBJPsych open2026
Factors influencing the outcomes of Community Treatment Orders: state-wide study using linked administrative health data from New South Wales, Australia.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Understanding compulsory community treatment across Australian jurisdictions: insights from three different data sources.BJPsych open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effectiveness of Community Treatment Orders (CTO) and the variability with which they are used remains the subject of ongoing debate.
aimsTo examine the associations between discharge from psychiatric in-patient care on to a CTO in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and hospital admissions and bed-days in the following 12 months.
methodRetrospective matched case-control study using linked administrative health data from NSW between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2023. Cases were individuals discharged on to a CTO after their first psychiatric hospital admission during the study period. We attempted to match controls 2:1 on age, gender and hospital discharge within 6 months of each other. Data were from the NSW Mental Health Ambulatory and Admitted Patient Data Collections.
resultsThere were 5506 individuals discharged on to CTOs and 9761 matched controls. Discharge on to a CTO did not affect the odds of hospital readmissions in the following 12 months (adjusted odds ratio (OR
conclusionsDischarge on to a CTO did not significantly affect hospital readmissions across the full sample, but did significantly lower the odds for individuals with non-affective psychosis. This suggests that targeted use of CTOs in specific populations (e.g., non-affective psychosis) warrants greater consideration, as the benefit of their use otherwise - especially from a human rights point of view - is unclear. REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000152527).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.