Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41804097›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Movie reconstruction from mouse visual cortex activity.

Joel Bauer, Troy W Margrie, Claudia Clopath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel BauerSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5858-166X
Troy W Margrie *Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-4578
Claudia Clopath *Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-8648

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R035806/1European Molecular Biology Organization ALTF 415-2024European Research Council MotorAdapt 101169605Gatsby Charitable Foundation GAT4057Simons Foundation 564408Wellcome Trust 10.35802/200790Wellcome Trust 10.35802/306384Wellcome Trust 318818/Z/24/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to reconstruct images represented by the brain has the potential to give us an intuitive understanding of what the brain sees. Reconstruction of visual input from human fMRI data has garnered significant attention in recent years. Comparatively less focus has been directed towards vision reconstruction from single-cell recordings, despite its potential to provide a more direct measure of the information represented by the brain. Here, we achieve high-quality reconstructions of natural movies presented to mice, from the activity of neurons in their visual cortex for the first time. Using our method of video optimization via backpropagation through a state-of-the-art dynamic neural encoding model, we reliably reconstruct 10 s movies at 30 Hz from two-photon calcium imaging data. We achieve a pixel-level correlation of 0.57 between ground-truth movies and single-trial reconstructions. Previous reconstructions based on awake mouse V1 neuronal responses to static images achieved a pixel-level correlation of 0.24 over a similar retinotopic area. We find that critical for high-quality reconstructions are the number of neurons in the dataset and the use of model ensembling. This paves the way for movie reconstruction to be used as a tool to investigate a variety of visual processing phenomena.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuronsVisual CortexAnimalsMicePhotic Stimulationcalcium imagingdeep learningmouseneuroscienceperceptionsensory reconstructionvisionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID41804097
PMCPMC12975128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.