ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
The Comparison between Different Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods by AFM-IR Nanospectroscopy.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent progress of plant-derived extracellular vesicle-like nanoparticles integrated with biomaterials for skin repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain cell-type-specific signatures and have been proposed as biomarkers in various diseases. However, due to their small dimensions, quantification and size distribution, the biophysical characterization of these particles is challenging and still controversial. The diffraction-limiting effect limits acquiring spectral data on EV samples in the mid-IR range, making it impossible to capture images and spectra at the nanoscale by conventional vibrational spectroscopy methods. Here, we employed atomic force microscopy-infrared nanospectroscopy (AFM-IR) technique to elucidate the molecular signatures of EVs isolated from blood (serum and plasma), as well as the direct correlation of their topography and biochemical signature with respect to the isolation method. EVs were extracted from serum or plasma from C57BL/6 male mice by Total Exosome Isolation Reagent (TEIR), ultracentrifugation, and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and evaluated by microreflectance in FTIR and AFM-IR analysis. The multivariate analysis by PCA and PLS-DA showed that phosphate groups could be significantly altered depending on the EV isolation/purification method, as well as glycosidic linkages. The SEC processing strongly depletes the amount of biomolecules whose bands fall in the region above 1150 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.