Trial reportBMC psychology2026
The effects of intensive mindfulness interventions on athletes' psychological states and cognitive performance: an fNIRS study.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial examined whether short-term intensive mindfulness training is associated with changes in executive task performance and prefrontal hemodynamic responses in elite athletes. Twenty-eight elite badminton athletes were randomly assigned to a 10-day mindfulness intervention or an active control (regular training plus neutral video viewing). Before and after the intervention, athletes completed the Tower of London (TOL) task while prefrontal responses were recorded using fNIRS; task accuracy (ACC) and reaction time (RT) were assessed. Neural responses were quantified using Hbdiff (HbO–HbR) and a neural efficiency (NE) index, and mindfulness was assessed with the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). The intervention group showed increased FFMQ scores, but no significant Group × Time interaction was observed for TOL-related ACC or RT. Under low cognitive load, CH15 (right vlPFC) showed a lower hemodynamic response, and the CH15 NE index showed a higher NE index than the control group; the CH15 (right vlPFC) response was positively associated with RT. These findings add to evidence on mindfulness-related modulation of vlPFC (CH15) responses under low cognitive load during executive task performance, although the absence of robust behavioral changes warrants cautious interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.