ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
Understanding how to maintain paramedic simulation-based education quality: a qualitative study.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-Based Education (SBE) is an essential component of paramedic training, offering a structured environment for students to develop clinical skills and decision-making capabilities. Despite the existence of SBE quality standards, such as those from the Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare (ASPiH) and the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL), the application of these standards in maintaining paramedic SBE quality remains inconsistent. This study explores paramedic educators’ perceptions of SBE quality, the challenges in applying SBE quality standards, and potential strategies for improvement.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative research design was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews with eight paramedic educators from five higher education institutions in the East Midlands, UK. Data were analysed using template analysis to identify key themes related to maintaining paramedic SBE quality.
resultsParticipants were aware of the importance of quality in SBE, yet demonstrated limited awareness and inconsistent application of formal quality standards, often relying more on informal, experience-driven approaches. Psychological safety and student engagement were emphasised as crucial to effective SBE, yet institutional constraints, including financial limitations, staffing shortages, inadequate faculty training, hindered quality assurance efforts. There were also challenges in standardising simulation scenarios and debriefing practices, with educators highlighting the need for greater institutional support and structured training in simulation pedagogy.
conclusionsThe study highlights significant opportunities to enhance the integration of quality standards in paramedic SBE, emphasising the need for improved faculty training, increased institutional investment, and structured quality assurance mechanisms. Addressing these barriers is essential to ensure consistency, effectiveness, and sustainability in paramedic SBE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.