Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2026
Awake burr hole craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common condition in older adults that often requires neurosurgical evacuation. Postoperative delirium is a frequent and clinically relevant postoperative complication in this population. This study investigated whether burr hole craniotomy for cSDH performed under local anesthesia (LA) reduces the risk of postoperative delirium and complications compared to general anesthesia (GA).
methodsThe ABC-SDH trial was a single-center, open-label, phase 2, prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at a tertiary academic medical center between October 2023 and November 2024. Fifty consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cSDH underwent burr hole craniotomy performed under either LA or GA. Primary outcomes were postoperative delirium (Confusion Assessment Method, CAM) and complications rates until discharge, and the recruitment rate. Secondary outcomes included procedural times and clinical outcome measures at discharge and at 30-day follow-up.
resultsLA was associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative delirium (4% vs. 32%, OR 0.09; 95%CI, 0.01–0.79; p = 0.03; NNT = 4). Complications occurred in 8% (LA) versus 32% (GA) (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03–0.96; p = 0.08). LA was also associated with significantly reduced procedural times (139.3 ± 53.0 vs. 196.0 ± 52.1 min; p = 0.002). The severity of complications and functional outcomes were comparable between groups.
conclusionLA was associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative delirium and a shorter periprocedural duration compared to GA in patients undergoing cSDH evacuation. As the first prospective trial to systematically assess the incidence of delirium following burr hole craniotomy for cSDH, the ABC-SDH trial highlights the feasibility and safety of LA in a delirium-prone population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.