ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Evaluating sex and gender as separate and interactive predictors of memory aging trajectory classes: an integrative data-driven approach.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA priority in aging and dementia research is to integrate sex (biological attribute) and gender (sociocultural/behavioural characteristics) in theories, designs, analyses, and intervention protocols. We recently reported a data-mining procedure for operationalizing empirically-derived composite gender variables in archival databases. The present study extends the prior cross-sectional approach by examining sex and gender as separate and interactive predictors of longitudinal data-driven memory trajectory classes.
methodsParticipants (N = 746) contributed baseline data for binary sex (female/male), education (years), and empirically-derived composite variables representing complementary gender facets. These facets included Manual Tasks and Physical Activities; Social and Household Management; Leisure, Socializing, and Travel; Cognitive Activity and Brain Games; Health Perceptions and Practices; and Subjective Memory Beliefs. We integrated these into a longitudinal episodic memory trajectory distribution spanning 42 years (53-95) of aging. Data-driven latent class growth analysis (LCGA) on the trajectory distribution identified discriminable classes. Using the R3STEP approach, we separately tested sex, gender facets, and education as predictors of membership in the higher (healthier) trajectory classes relative to the lowest (benchmark) class. We then included interaction terms to test for sex moderation of gender effects. Finally, we identified all genotyped participants and tested whether sex and gender effects were moderated by Apolipoprotein E (APOE).
resultsLCGA revealed three memory classes: High-Stable (highest level/relatively stable), Moderate/Normal-Declining (average level/moderate decline), and Low-Declining (lowest level/steepest decline). Several variables separately predicted High-Stable membership. For sex, females were more likely than males to belong to this class. For gender, (a) higher scores for Social and Household Management, Cognitive Activity and Brain Games, and Subjective Memory Beliefs predicted High-Stable membership; and (b) higher scores for Manual Tasks and Physical Activities and Health Perceptions and Practices decreased the likelihood of High-Stable membership (relative to Low-Declining). Moderate/Normal-Declining membership was predicted by Social and Household Management (higher). For education, more years predicted High-Stable membership. Moderation analyses indicated that gender effects were consistent across both sexes and APOE carrier status.
conclusionsData-driven analyses show that biological sex and measurable facets of gender differentially contribute to memory trajectory patterns over a 42-year span of cognitively unimpaired aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.