ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Noble gases xenon and argon: from cellular signalling mechanisms to organoprotection and clinical applications.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Xenon Encapsulation in Liposomes, Nanobubbles, and Microbubbles: Delivery Strategies, Preclinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Neuroprotective effects of noble gases following acquired brain injury: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoble gases xenon (Xe) and argon (Ar) emerge as promising therapeutic agents. Extensive studies have validated their efficacy across various models of organ injury, positioning them as novel candidates for clinical translation in critical care and perioperative medicine. MAIN BODY: Xe and Ar exert protective effects through multiple mechanisms, including activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) pathway, inhibition of regulated cell death pathways, such as apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis, and suppression of pro-inflammatory signaling. By modulating these key signaling pathways, Xe and Ar have been shown to improve outcomes in neurological, cardiac, renal, and hepatic systems across diverse models of ischemia-reperfusion injury, traumatic brain injury, and systemic inflammation. Clinically, Xe has shown efficacy in anesthesia, neonatal neuroprotection, and cardiac arrest management. Ar, with greater availability and lower costs, holds promise for broader clinical use but remains in the early stage of translational research.
conclusionXe and Ar represent novel biologically active gases with the potential to provide promising therapies in perioperative and clinical care medicine. Overcoming current limitations, such as a lack of standardized delivery systems and optimized dosing strategies, is key to uncovering their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.