ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Development and validation of a nomogram using transaminase levels, cycle cost, and hair loss as predictive factors for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify clinical parameters influencing treatment efficacy during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for esophageal cancer (EC) patients, with a particular focus on demographic and clinical variables, to establish predictive biomarkers for chemotherapeutic response.
methodsA total of 194 EC patients undergoing NAC were retrospectively included. Significant predictors of pathological response were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, followed by the construction of a predictive nomogram. The model’s discriminative performance was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, while calibration accuracy and clinical utility were assessed using bootstrap-corrected calibration curves (1,000 resamples) and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. External validation was performed on an independent cohort of 74 EC patients.
resultsBoth univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified abnormal transaminase levels, average cycle cost, and hair loss as significant risk factors affecting the effectiveness of NAC (p < 0.05). The constructed nomogram model demonstrated strong predictive performance, with a concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.735. Calibration curves showed a high degree of fit between predicted and observed outcomes, while DCA confirmed the clinical utility of these predictive factors. External validation yielded an AUC of 0.865, further supporting the model’s predictive accuracy.
conclusionBy incorporating the indicators of abnormal transaminase levels, average chemotherapy cycle cost, and the occurrence of hair loss, the developed nomogram effectively identifies EC patients who are more likely to benefit from NAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.