ArticleBMC nursing2026
Effectiveness of nursing interventions on preventing the risk of infection in hospitalized adults: a systematic review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urgency of a political agenda for the reclassification of hazard pay.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a global challenge for patient safety and quality of care, affecting millions of individuals each year and resulting in substantial morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. In Europe alone, over 4.2 million episodes of HAI occur annually. Nurses play a pivotal role in infection prevention through the implementation of evidence-based interventions aimed at disrupting transmission chains and reducing infection risk. Despite the widespread dissemination of preventive strategies, marked heterogeneity persists in their implementation and effectiveness, influenced by institutional, behavioural, and contextual factors.
objectiveTo critically evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions in preventing infection risk among hospitalised adults through a systematic review of the literature.
methodsA systematic review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with prior registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024582820). Searches were performed across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools, and the certainty of the evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.
resultsOut of 8,123 records identified, 22 RCTs (1979–2024) met the inclusion criteria. Nursing interventions, including daily body bathing with chlorhexidine, prevention bundles for catheters and other devices, promotion of hand hygiene, educational strategies, and environmental disinfection (e.g. ultraviolet-C light) demonstrated a significant reduction in HAI incidence compared with usual care. Multimodal and integrated interventions proved more effective than isolated measures. The overall certainty of evidence was moderate for infection reduction and adherence improvement, but inconsistent for patient mortality and satisfaction outcomes.
conclusionsEvidence-based nursing interventions, particularly when applied in a coordinated and multimodal manner, substantially reduce infection risk among hospitalised adults. These findings support the integration of such interventions into institutional programmes and infection control policies. Further multicentre RCTs are recommended to assess implementation fidelity, cost-effectiveness, and patient-centred outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.