ArticleBMC public health2026
Identifying depression in middle-aged and older adults stratified by chewing ability using machine learning models: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDepression and chewing difficulty are prevalent health concerns among middle-aged and older adults. This study aimed to develop group-specific machine learning models to identify depression in middle-aged and older adults with preserved versus impaired chewing ability, enabling tailored prevention and management strategies.
methodsThe research data was derived from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Five machine learning algorithms were employed to develop group-specific models stratified by chewing ability, which were compared against a unified model for validation. The evaluation metrics for the models included accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was utilized to analyze feature importance and to interpret the individualized identification process within the optimal model.
resultsThe analyzed sample consisted of 15,459 middle-aged and older adults, with 82.84% of them aged between 45 and 69. Of the participants, 32.06% were identified as having depressive symptoms, while 38.63% exhibited impaired chewing ability. Surpassing the unified model in performance, the Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models emerged as the optimal algorithms for identifying depression in middle-aged and older adults with preserved versus impaired chewing ability, respectively. Feature importance analysis revealed that self-rated health was the most significant feature in the DNN model, while life satisfaction was the most important factor in the MLP model.
conclusionsThis study developed group-specific DNN and MLP models to identify depression in middle-aged and older adults with preserved versus impaired chewing ability. These findings provide valuable references for developing targeted screening tools to support the prevention and early intervention of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.