ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of E. coli from livestock and wildlife in Wyoming, U.S.A.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study measured phenotypic resistance of enteric Escherichia coli (E. coli) obtained from livestock and wildlife across agricultural districts within Wyoming, U.S.A., to antimicrobials used in the cattle industry. It is the first investigation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in E. coli from free-ranging wild ungulates in the American West. Although wildlife can harbor resistant bacteria, this host population is generally understudied in AMR research. By identifying overlapping AMR profiles between livestock and free-ranging wild herbivores, transmission dynamics may be better understood. One hundred and eighty-one enteric E. coli isolates were tested for phenotypic resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftiofur, florfenicol, and tulathromycin using broth microdilution susceptibility testing. For statistical analysis, a logistic regression model was constructed in R using R Studio. A mass spectrometry profile was constructed for each isolate, and protein dendrograms were generated to assess clustering by agricultural district and resistance phenotype.
resultFor the antimicrobials evaluated, a higher number of AMR E. coli isolates were detected in livestock than in wildlife. Wildlife isolates had significantly lower odds of resistance to ampicillin (89.6% decrease in odds of resistance (95% confidence interval (CI) 64.3% − 97.0%), χ21 = 20.251, p = < 0.001), tetracycline (99.1% decrease in odds of resistance (95% CI 93.0% − 99.9%), χ21 = 79.608, p = < 0.001), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (81.4% decrease in odds of resistance (95% CI 14.5% − 96.0%), χ21 = 6.421, p = 0.011), and florfenicol (66.2% decrease in odds of resistance (95% CI 23.1% − 85.1%), χ21 = 7.4272, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the odds of resistance between wildlife and livestock for tulathromycin (χ21 = 2.0846, p = 0.15). Ceftiofur could not be statistically evaluated. No significant difference in the odds of resistance was observed across agricultural districts. Simple mass spectrometry did not reveal clustering of isolates by host type, location, or resistance profile.
conclusionsThis study provides a valuable first look into AMR in E. coli from Wyoming’s wildlife and livestock. As AMR remains an ever-increasing threat, it is encouraging that this study found a consistently low number of wildlife isolates exhibited AMR, even to those antimicrobials with high numbers of AMR isolates in livestock. However, the increased resistance in livestock E. coli, and the presence of some wildlife E. coli isolates resistant to multiple drugs is concerning. The findings of this study highlight the need for increased multi-angled AMR research and surveillance efforts in livestock and wildlife in the American West.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.