Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803846›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

A feasibility and acceptability of virtual reality as a pain relief measure post primary and revision total knee replacement surgery in a hospital setting: quasi-experimental study.

Queen Adebola Adeyanju, Boyne Bellew, Maria Joao Cardoso Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Queen Adebola AdeyanjuNursing Research Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. queen.adeyanju@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5692-0808
Boyne BellewNursing Research Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Maria Joao Cardoso TeixeiraNursing Research Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-3019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective post-operative pain management remains a significant global challenge, especially following joint replacement surgeries. Despite the increasing interest in non-pharmacological interventions, persistent post-surgical pain, opioid dependence, and patient recovery demands continue to drive the search for safer and more cost-effective alternatives. Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as promising, non-invasive, and drug-free intervention, with increasing evidence supporting its use in managing acute and procedure-related pain. However, its application in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) or revision total knee replacement (RTKR) has not yet been evaluated.

methodsA single-centre, quasi-experimental feasibility study was conducted over 12 weeks in a UK specialist orthopaedic hospital. Adults undergoing TKR or RTKR were recruited and consented pre-operatively. Beginning 24 h post-surgery, participants were offered up to three VR sessions using the DR.VR system. Each session lasted approximately 7.5 min and included immersive, patient-selected experiences. Pain and anxiety levels were assessed pre- and post-session using validated scales. Acceptability was measured via participant questionnaires following each session.

resultsOf 145 eligible patients, 57 were screened, 42 received study information, and 23 consented to participate: 56.5% female; 43.48%males; mean 69.23, ± 11.64 years. Three withdrew, and 20 participants completed at least one VR session with a retention rate of 87%. In total, 44 sessions were completed. Pain reduction was reported by 81.4% and anxiety reduction by 77.3% of participants post-session. Acceptability was high: 95% enjoyed the experience, 85% felt distracted from pain, and 90% would recommend VR for post-surgical use. No adverse effects were reported. Participant feedback suggested longer session durations and higher-quality content could further enhance the intervention.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that VR for managing post-operative pain and anxiety in TKR and RTKR patients is a feasible and acceptable non-pharmacological strategy. Findings support its potential as a safe, user-friendly adjunct to standard care. However, further large-scale, multi-centre trials are needed to evaluate efficacy, optimise protocols, and support routine implementation in post-operative settings.

trial registrationEthical approval was obtained from Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW), UK on 27 January 2022 (21/NW/0359).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainVirtual RealityAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationTreatment OutcomeFeasibilityKnee replacementNon-pharmacological pain managementVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID41803846
PMCPMC13085278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.