ArticleBMC medical education2026
Pediatric faculty attitudes on point-of-care ultrasound education in residency: a multicenter study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a bedside diagnostic and procedural tool with growing relevance in clinical medicine. While widely integrated into adult emergency medicine and increasingly introduced in undergraduate medical education, its adoption in pediatric residency programs remains limited. There is a lack of standardized curricula, and little is known about pediatric attending physicians’ perspectives on POCUS education — who are key to curriculum development, supervision, and institutional implementation. This study aimed to assess attitudes, training experiences, and perceived barriers among pediatric faculty regarding POCUS integration into pediatric residency training.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed to pediatric attending physicians at two large, urban, tertiary care centers. The survey included demographic data, clinical POCUS use, prior training, perceived importance, and barriers implementing a POCUS program. Data was collected using REDCap and analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons.
resultsOf 1,000 invited faculty, 134 responded (13.4%). POCUS was used in pediatric clinical practice by 28%, primarily in emergency medicine, anesthesia, critical care, and surgery (usage ≥ 75%). Of the 28% of respondents who said they use POCUS, 84% of them stated they received some level of training, meaning 16% of providers who use POCUS report never having formal training. Faculty with fewer years in practice were significantly more likely to have received POCUS education during residency and to express interest in further training (p < 0.05). Overall, 90% of faculty supported integrating POCUS into pediatric residency programs, with the highest support in procedural specialties and among those with prior training. Common barriers included limited faculty availability, lack of equipment, time constraints, and funding needs. Perceived clinical relevance varied by specialty and training background: only half of faculty believed POCUS would have improved clinical care in the past month.
conclusionPediatric faculty broadly support incorporating POCUS into residency education, especially in high-acuity specialties and among more recently trained physicians. However, training gaps and infrastructure barriers persist. These findings highlight a need for structured, specialty-sensitive curricula, faculty development, and institutional investment to align pediatric training with evolving clinical standards and trainee expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.