ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Evaluation of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification in arthritic knees following robotic total knee arthroplasty.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic knee arthroplasty: systems, alignment strategies, and future directions.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification describes knee morphology using arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Currently there is uncertainty about the relevance and restoration of coronal alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly among Asian populations. This study examined changes in coronal alignment following robotic TKA using functional alignment, along with concordance between CPAK JLO and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) – this would help develop strategies to optimize outcomes of TKA among Asian patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis was undertaken for 333 knees that received cruciate-retaining robotic TKA during 2019–2023. Pre- and 6-week postoperative radiographs were used to assess aHKA, JLO, CPAK phenotypes, and KJLO. Maintenance of constitutional CPAK alignment and crossover in aHKA and JLO categories were estimated. The concordance between CPAK JLO and KJLO at pre- and post-operative levels were also estimated.
resultsPreoperatively, 72% showed varus aHKA, 82% apex distal JLO, and CPAK type I was predominant (63%). Postoperatively, varus alignment persisted in 50% and CPAK type IV in 32%. Constitutional aHKA and JLO was maintained in 46% and 42% knees, respectively. Less than 7% patients crossed over to a category beyond neutral considering aHKA or JLO. The most frequent phenotypic change was from CPAK type I to IV. Concordance between CPAK JLO and KJLO increased from 14% to 41% postoperatively, with highest agreement for apex proximal knees and lowest for apex distal knees.
conclusionsWhile constitutional CPAK was maintained in less than 50% patients, overcorrection in CPAK was minimal. Therefore, functional alignment with robotic assistance facilitates optimization by limiting extreme adjustments to constitutional CPAK following TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.