SynthesisBMC medical education2026
The effectiveness of interventions designed to enhance and maintain medical student wellbeing: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychological well-being is crucial for medical students, who face high levels of stress throughout their training. This systematic review examines interventions designed to enhance the well-being of medical students, addressing gaps in previous research that often focused on specific interventions or included broader health professional populations.
methodsThis systematic review was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018097172). The review analysed 33 studies identified from a search of Medline and PsycINFO, identifying a variety of interventions and outcome measures of wellbeing. Results were narratively synthesised and primary studies assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool for interventional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool for observational studies.
resultsThe most effective interventions were mindfulness-based programs, particularly when combined with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). These approaches helped students manage stress, anxiety, and depression, which occur frequently among medical students. Notably, online mindfulness programs were as effective as in-person sessions, offering flexibility for students with demanding schedules. Voluntary participation in these interventions also led to better outcomes, highlighting the importance of student engagement. Other effective interventions included positive psychology programs, which foster resilience, coping ability and gratitude, and physical exercise which reduced stress and improved overall well-being. In contrast, voluntary mentoring programs and health education initiatives showed limited effectiveness in reducing psychological distress, possibly due to inconsistent implementation or a lack of emotional support. Interestingly, the review found that the frequency and duration of effective interventions did not significantly affect their efficacy. This suggests that simply including and delivering wellbeing interventions in curricular may be more important than their length or frequency. Participants who engaged in mindfulness and other well-being interventions also maintained improvements in mental health during follow-up assessments, indicating long-term benefits.
conclusionVoluntary mindfulness interventions combined with CBT, along with positive psychology and exercise programs, were identified as the most effective strategies for enhancing the well-being of medical students. Future research should explore integrating these interventions into medical curricula to ensure lasting mental health support throughout students’ training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.