Trial reportBMC oral health2026
Evaluation of plaque removal by triple-headed manual toothbrush: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06594757 (Evaluation of Plaque Removal by Triple-Headed Manual Toothbrush), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Plaque Removal by Triple-Headed Manual Toothbrush: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis examiner-blinded, randomized controlled trial compared the plaque removal efficacy of a triple-headed manual toothbrush (3HB) to a conventional manual toothbrush. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-eight non-smoker, right-handed participants (aged 20–50 years) were randomly grouped: The first group (Conventional Manual Toothbrush-CMB) was given a manual toothbrush and the second group (3Head Brush-3HB) was given a toothbrush with a 3-head geometric design. All participants were assessed with The Rustogi et al. Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI). Clinical trial registration number of the present study is “NCT06594757”.
resultsForty-eight eligible participants were randomized into two groups (n = 24 each). No significant differences in baseline demographics were observed. Plaque scores evaluated before and after brushing showed no significant difference between the groups in marginal, aproximal, anterior, premolar and whole mouth regions. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in plaque scores in all regions after brushing in both groups (p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference between genders in terms of plaque scores, while plaque reduction was effective regardless of age or gender in all regions after brushing (p < 0.001). The findings suggest that both toothbrush designs are effective in plaque removal.
conclusionsThe triple-headed manual toothbrush demonstrated plaque removal efficacy statistically comparable to, but not superior to, the conventional manual toothbrush in healthy, non-impaired adults. Its clinical advantage may be specific to populations with manual dexterity challenges. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Problems related to teeth and gums can be prevented and controlled by appropriate mechanical cleaning of dental plaque. In order to successfully remove microbial dental plaque, teeth should be brushed regularly, for sufficient time and with the correct technique. Toothbrush manufacturers continue to work to remove plaque better with different designs of the head of the toothbrush. It is tried to increase the plaque removal efficiency of classical brushes with different designs of areas such as bristles, handle, head angle and structure. The effectiveness of different toothbrush designs has been demonstrated in studies investigating plaque removal efficiency, especially in interproximal and gingival areas that can be cleaned more difficult. This study’s results demonstrated that removing plaque from the tooth surface by effective tooth brushing may help improve oral health.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06594757, registered on September 09, 2024 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.