Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803789›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Evaluation of plaque removal by triple-headed manual toothbrush: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Merve İşcan Yapar, Didem Özkal Emi̇noğlu, Didar Betül Doğan, Güler Başyi̇ği̇t, Kamber Kaşali̇

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06594757 (Evaluation of Plaque Removal by Triple-Headed Manual Toothbrush), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06594757 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Plaque Removal by Triple-Headed Manual Toothbrush: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled48ConditionsPlaque, DentalArmsToothbrushing with triple-headed manual toothbrush, Toothbrushing with standard manual toothbrush
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merve İşcan YaparFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9712-0978
Didem Özkal Emi̇noğluFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. ddm_ozkal@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-3368
Didar Betül DoğanFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-6254
Güler Başyi̇ği̇tFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0009-4335-1859
Kamber Kaşali̇Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-5263

Funding

Scientific Research Projects Coordınatıon Unit of Atatürk University TSA-2023-13318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis examiner-blinded, randomized controlled trial compared the plaque removal efficacy of a triple-headed manual toothbrush (3HB) to a conventional manual toothbrush. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-eight non-smoker, right-handed participants (aged 20–50 years) were randomly grouped: The first group (Conventional Manual Toothbrush-CMB) was given a manual toothbrush and the second group (3Head Brush-3HB) was given a toothbrush with a 3-head geometric design. All participants were assessed with The Rustogi et al. Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI). Clinical trial registration number of the present study is “NCT06594757”.

resultsForty-eight eligible participants were randomized into two groups (n = 24 each). No significant differences in baseline demographics were observed. Plaque scores evaluated before and after brushing showed no significant difference between the groups in marginal, aproximal, anterior, premolar and whole mouth regions. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in plaque scores in all regions after brushing in both groups (p < 0.001). There was also no significant difference between genders in terms of plaque scores, while plaque reduction was effective regardless of age or gender in all regions after brushing (p < 0.001). The findings suggest that both toothbrush designs are effective in plaque removal.

conclusionsThe triple-headed manual toothbrush demonstrated plaque removal efficacy statistically comparable to, but not superior to, the conventional manual toothbrush in healthy, non-impaired adults. Its clinical advantage may be specific to populations with manual dexterity challenges. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Problems related to teeth and gums can be prevented and controlled by appropriate mechanical cleaning of dental plaque. In order to successfully remove microbial dental plaque, teeth should be brushed regularly, for sufficient time and with the correct technique. Toothbrush manufacturers continue to work to remove plaque better with different designs of the head of the toothbrush. It is tried to increase the plaque removal efficiency of classical brushes with different designs of areas such as bristles, handle, head angle and structure. The effectiveness of different toothbrush designs has been demonstrated in studies investigating plaque removal efficiency, especially in interproximal and gingival areas that can be cleaned more difficult. This study’s results demonstrated that removing plaque from the tooth surface by effective tooth brushing may help improve oral health.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06594757, registered on September 09, 2024 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueToothbrushingAdultDental Plaque IndexEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultMicrobial dental plaqueModified Bass TechniqueOral hygieneRustogi Modifiye Navy Plaque IndexToothbrush

Identifiers

PMID41803789
PMCPMC13085586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.