Trial reportBMC psychiatry2026
Can dyadic rope-skipping enhance cooperative behavior in female university students with depressive symptoms? Evidence from behavioral and fNIRS hyperscanning data.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImpaired cooperative behavior represents a prominent social dysfunction in individuals with depressive symptoms. Synchronous exercise has been proposed to facilitate social interaction. However, empirical evidence regarding its effects on cooperation and associated neural responses in individuals with depressive symptoms remains limited. This study examined whether a single session of dyadic rope-skipping enhances cooperative behavior and prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) in female college students with depressive symptoms.
methodsIn a randomized controlled trial, 110 female college students with depressive symptoms were assigned to an experimental group (28 dyads) or a control group (27 dyads). The experimental group completed a 30-minute dyadic rope-skipping session, whereas the control group remained seated for an equivalent duration. Cooperative behavior was assessed before and after the intervention using a Prisoner’s Dilemma task. Prefrontal INS was concurrently recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning.
resultsCompared with pre-intervention, the experimental group showed significant increases in both individual cooperation rate (p = 0.041) and mutual cooperation rate (p = 0.028), along with significant decreases in individual defection rate (p = 0.039) and mutual defection rate (p = 0.040). Following the intervention, compared with the control group, the experimental group demonstrated higher individual (p < 0.001) and mutual (p = 0.013) cooperation rates, lower individual (p < 0.001) and mutual (p = 0.002) defection rates. fNIRS hyperscanning result showed significantly enhanced INS within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and frontopolar cortex following dyadic exercise. Although behavioral improvements were not linearly associated with neural changes (all p > 0.0033), robust synchronization increases were observed across prefrontal channels, specifically, INS changes in CH17-7 were strongly correlated with CH13-7 (r = 0.497, p < 0.001) and CH17-17 (r = 0.601, p < 0.001).
conclusionsA single session of dyadic rope-skipping significantly improved cooperative behavior and enhanced prefrontal INS in female college students with depressive symptoms. These findings provide convergent behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that synchronous exercise can promote social functioning in individuals with depressive symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.