Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803761›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2026

Prevalence and determinants of diabetes distress and its association with self-management among patients living with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.

Thilina Samarathunga, Harsha Dissanayake, Himasal Liyanage, Laksara De Silva, Uditha Bulugahapitiya, Manilka Sumanatilleke, Prasad Katulanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thilina SamarathungaCentre for Diabetes, Endocrine & Cardio-metabolic Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. thilina.tas@gmail.com.
Harsha DissanayakeCentre for Diabetes, Endocrine & Cardio-metabolic Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Himasal LiyanageDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Laksara De SilvaCentre for Diabetes, Endocrine & Cardio-metabolic Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Uditha BulugahapitiyaDiabetes and Endocrine Unit, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Manilka SumanatillekeDiabetes and Endocrine Unit, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Prasad KatulandaCentre for Diabetes, Endocrine & Cardio-metabolic Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes distress (DD) refers to the emotional and psychological strain related to the management of diabetes and its complications. It can result in poor self-management behaviours and suboptimal health outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, determinants and impact of DD on self-management behaviours and glycaemic control among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.

methodsA descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic of the National Hospital, Sri Lanka. DD was measured using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17), comprising four domains: emotional burden, physician-related, regimen-related, and interpersonal distress. Self-management was assessed using the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R), covering five domains: glucose monitoring, medication adherence, dietary control, physical activity and healthcare use. Both instruments were interviewer-administered. DD severity was defined as clinically significant if DDS-17 score was ≥ 2 (moderate-high level of DD). Logistic regression was used to identify determinants of DD and Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess the associations between DD, DSMQ-R scores and glycaemic control. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsAmong 322 participants (mean age 59.9 ± 10.2 years; mean diabetes duration 11.4 ± 7.7 years), the prevalence of DD was 30.4% (95% CI: 25.7%–35.7%). After adjusting for confounders, determinants of DD were age range of 41–59 years (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 2.0-6.5, p < 0.001), female gender (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4–5.4, p = 0.01), suboptimal glycaemic control of HbA1c ≥ 7% (OR 4.4, 95% CI: 1.9–10.1, p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3–7.3, p = 0.01). Self-management activity scores including glucose monitoring, medication adherence, dietary control, physical activity and healthcare use had significant and negative correlations with both DD and HbA1C (p < 0.05).

conclusionsDiabetes distress significantly impairs self-management and glycaemic control among people living with T2DM. Routine screening for diabetes-related distress using tools such as the DDS-17 should be integrated into diabetes care to identify patients experiencing moderate-to-high levels of distress and who are therefore at risk of poor self-management and adverse disease outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementStress, PsychologicalAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisSri LankaTertiary Care CentersDiabetes distressDiabetes self-careGlycaemic controlLifestyle modificationSelf-management behavioursSouth AsiaType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41803761
PMCPMC13019868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.