ArticleBMC public health2026
A mixed methods snapshot of the Man Walk program: a community-based response to loneliness and health among older Australian men.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'Walking is the means to bring you together': understanding men's participation and non-participation in a group walking programme in Australia.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Man Walk is a national, community-led initiative promoting men’s mental health, physical activity, and social connection through group walks. Since its establishment in 2018, no evidence has described participant characteristics, engagement, or health outcomes. This study aimed to describe participants’ characteristics, health status, factors associated with health and wellbeing outcomes, and perceived benefits of program.
methodsA mixed methods design was used, with an online survey conducted in March and July 2025 among Man Walk participants across Australia. Measures included EQ-VAS (self-rated health), PHQ-4 (anxiety and depression), De Jong-Gierveld (loneliness), and AUDIT-C (alcohol risk). Multivariable regression models examined associations between explanatory variables and outcomes. Open-ended responses were analysed using inductive content analysis.
resultsA total of 377 men completed the survey. Most were aged ≥ 55 years (66%), partnered (77%), and residing in major cities (58%) or inner regional areas (30%). More than half (54%) reported moderate to high loneliness, and 17.5% and 14.7% reported symptoms of anxiety and depression, respectively. 31% had participated for ≥ 3 years, and 19% joined ≥ 8 walks/month. Emotional loneliness was associated with anxiety (OR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.93, 12.0), while social loneliness was associated with depression (OR = 5.70; 95% CI: 2.03, 18.8). Longer participation (≥ 3 years) predicted lower odds of depression (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.95). Frequent walkers (≥ 8 walks/month) had lower odds of risky drinking (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.95). The absence of chronic conditions was associated with higher self-rated health, whereas those with emotional loneliness and depression were associated with poorer self-rated health. Content analysis revealed that participants identified the program’s benefits primarily as socialisation (73.2%), followed by mental health support (26.8%) and physical health improvement (26.5%).
conclusionsThe Man Walk engages men at elevated risk of loneliness and mental distress, providing a low-cost, accessible platform for exercise, connection, and mutual support. Sustained participation appears protective against depressive symptoms and health risks. Community-led, male-focused walking initiatives represent promising, scalable strategies to enhance men’s mental health and social wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.