ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Machine learning-based predictive model for the diagnosis of PH pulmonary hypertension diagnosis integrating cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and clinical biomarkers.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive vascular disorder where early diagnosis is critical for improving patient outcomes. While right heart catheterization (RHC) remains the gold standard for diagnosis, its invasive nature often leads to delayed PH detection. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model incorporating MRI-derived parameters to facilitate early PH diagnosis.
methodsIn this retrospective study, after data filtering, 323 participants (161 RHC-confirmed PH patients and 162 controls) who underwent cardiac MRI at Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University between January 2021 and May 2024 were enrolled for model development, with a 7:3 split for training and internal validation. An additional external validation cohort (48 PH cases and 16 controls) was collected from June 2024 to June 2025. We analyzed 27 MRI parameters reflecting cardiac structure/function, 60 laboratory biomarkers (including NT-proBNP and D-dimer), and basic demographic information (age, sex). Key MRI features were selected via recursive feature elimination (RFE), followed by comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning models (XGBoost, logistic regression, etc.) to identify optimal predictors. SHAP analysis elucidated variable importance, while Random forest selected significant laboratory biomarkers. The final integrated model combined MRI and laboratory predictors, with performance assessed via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram and web-based calculator were developed for clinical implementation.
resultsFifteen MRI parameters showed strong PH association: pulmonary artery diameter (PA), right end-diastolic volumes (REDV), left end-diastolic volumes (LEDV), left end-systolic volumes (LESV), right cardiac index (RCI), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), left atrial anteroposterior diameter (LAAPD), left cardiac output (LCO), right stroke volumes (RSV), left stroke volumes (LSV), left stroke volume index (LSVI), left ventricular lateral wall thickness (LVLWT), left basal interventricular septal thickness (LIVST), and ascending aortic diameters (AAD), descending aortic diameters (DAD). SHAP analysis identified PA, REDV, and LEDV as top predictors. The MRI-derived model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability across all metrics (AUC, precision-recall, specificity-sensitivity). Key laboratory predictors included BUN, γGGT, TBIL, and D-dimer. The combined model achieved AUCs of 0.999 (training), 0.944 (internal validation), and 0.897 (external validation), with excellent calibration. For enhanced clinical utility, we have deployed the developed PH prediction model as a web-based calculator ( https://jianghx.shinyapps.io/PH_prediction_MRIIndex/ ) to facilitate early diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.
conclusionOur study developed a high-performance PH prediction model integrating cardiac MRI and laboratory biomarkers, demonstrating robust diagnostic accuracy that could enable earlier PH detection while circumventing RHC-related diagnostic delays. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.