ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Women's experiences and perceptions of postpartum care in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostpartum care is essential for maternal well-being, yet limited qualitative work in Saudi Arabia has explored how women make sense of early postnatal experiences. This study explored postpartum women’s experiences of birth and hospital care and how perceived emotional, informational, and cultural support shaped recovery and health-promoting behaviours.
methodsA qualitative study guided by Reflexive Thematic Analysis using semi-structured interviews was conducted at King Khaled University Hospital in Riyadh. Data were collected between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 20 postpartum women who were medically stable, had recently given birth (vaginal or caesarean), had different levels of parity and were able to participate in an interview.
resultsFour interconnected themes described women’s experiences: physical recovery and birth experiences; informational and educational support; emotional and social support; and systemic and cultural influences. Women identified gaps in several WHO-recommended elements, including consistency of pain management, breastfeeding counselling, and discharge preparation. Limited informational support reduced perceived control and hindered engagement in health-promoting behaviours, reflecting key constructs of Pender’s model. Emotional well-being was shaped by the quality of staff communication, perceived respect, and the availability of family support, which influenced confidence and adjustment.
conclusionThis study highlights that, although clinical care is generally competent, gaps in emotional support, informational continuity, nursery availability, and discharge preparedness continue to affect women’s confidence, recovery, and perceived safety. Strengthening postpartum services in line with WHO postnatal care standards through flexible, woman-centred, and culturally responsive approaches together with enhanced behavioural support may improve maternal adaptation and overall well-being. Future multi-site research is needed to guide postpartum care policies and service models more broadly in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.