Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803706›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2026

Safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation as treatment of chronic cluster headache: an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Ida Stisen Fogh-Andersen, Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen, Anja Sofie Petersen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Kaare Meier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05023460 (Treatment of Chronic Cluster Headache), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05023460 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment of Chronic Cluster Headache (Horton's Headache) with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Occipital Nerve Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2021 to 2024Enrolled38ConditionsChronic Cluster Headache, Primary Headache Disorder, Headache, Cluster HeadacheArmsParesthesia-free (burst) ONS, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ida Stisen Fogh-AndersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-9907
Jens Christian Hedemann SørensenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-7405
Anja Sofie PetersenDanish Headache Centre, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-6038
Rigmor Højland JensenDanish Headache Centre, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6433-5887
Kaare MeierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. kaamei@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7677-406X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccipital nerve stimulation has shown promising results in attack prevention in patients with chronic cluster headache, but evidence from controlled trials is scarce. Conventional (tonic) occipital nerve stimulation elicits paresthesia, hampering blinded comparison to placebo. Using paresthesia-free burst occipital nerve stimulation, we conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

methodsThe study is an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving participants with chronic cluster headache. It comprised a four-week baseline, a 12-week trial with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, occipital nerve stimulator implantation, a 12-week randomized, double-blind burst occipital nerve stimulation treatment period, and a 12-week open-label tonic occipital nerve stimulation treatment period. The primary outcomes were safety and the proportion of participants reporting a ≥30% reduction in attack frequency in the randomized and open-label trial phases.

resultsParticipants were enrolled between August 2021 and October 2023. 116 chronic cluster headache patients were assessed for eligibility. Sixty-five were excluded, and 51 entered baseline observation. Before occipital nerve stimulator implantation and randomization, an additional 13 were excluded. Thirty-eight participants underwent occipital nerve stimulator implantation and were randomly assigned to burst occipital nerve stimulation (n = 19) or placebo (n = 19). After the randomized trial phase, the proportion of ≥30% responders was 18.81% (95%CI 0.28%–37.87%) in the burst occipital nerve stimulation group and 50.02% (95%CI 26.87%–73.09%) in the placebo group. The likelihood of reaching the primary endpoint was 31.20% (95%CI 1.29%–61.23%, p = 0.042) higher in the placebo group. After the open-label phase, 42.09% (95%CI 19.91%–64.34%) in the burst occipital nerve stimulation group and 51.11% (95%CI 27.32%–74.88%) in the placebo group had ≥30% frequency reduction. In total, 20 adverse events were registered; eight were treatment-related serious adverse events. The most common adverse event was temporary occipital dysesthesia in eight participants. DISCUSSION: Occipital nerve stimulation reduced attack frequency but was not superior to placebo. The treatment had an acceptable safety profile and was well-tolerated. The results call for attention to sufficient placebo control when planning further studies.

trial registrationThe trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT05023460).Study registration date: July 27th 2021.

Indexed as

Cluster HeadacheElectric Stimulation TherapySpinal NervesTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41803706
PMCPMC12980930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.