ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Optimization of UV-A/PAR ratio for phenolic accumulation in kale using 3D radiation interception modeling.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn vertical farms using light-emitting diode radiation, supplemental ultraviolet (UV)-A radiation at specific wavelengths and energy levels has been shown to enhance photosynthesis and biomass accumulation, indicating its potential as an additional light source. However, plant responses to supplemental UV-A vary depending on the intensity of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). In this study, three-dimensional (3D) radiation interception analysis based on ray-tracing simulation was conducted to examine how the UV-A/PAR ratio affects phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of kale and to determine appropriate UV-A levels, under different photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD), selected based on previous studies. Kale transplants were grown for 3 weeks under 150 or 300 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD, and supplemented with UV-A radiation (385 nm) at 15, 30, or 45 W m− 2 for 6 days before harvest. Radiation interception was analyzed using a 3D plant model and ray-tracing simulation.
resultsKale growth was substantially greater under 300 than under 150 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD. Growth responses to supplemental UV-A radiation varied significantly with PPFD level. UV-A radiation increased shoot fresh weight and leaf area under 150 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD, but not under 300 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD at 6 days after the onset of treatment. Supplemental UV-A radiation also enhanced total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, with the magnitude of these effects dependent on PPFD level. Under 150 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD, the 15 W m− 2 UV-A treatment enhanced phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, whereas no increase was observed under 300 µmol m− 2 s− 1 PPFD. Radiation interception analysis indicated that differences in absorbed radiation between the two PPFD conditions were primarily attributable to plant size. The correlation between UV-A radiation intensity and phenolic accumulation was stronger when based on intercepted radiation than on measured intensity. Notably, higher phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were observed at UV-A/PAR ratio ranging from 0.1 to 0.2.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that supplemental UV-A radiation should be optimized considering PPFD level and radiation interception to enhance phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in kale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.