ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Plastid phylogenomics illuminates backbone relationships, divergence times and character evolution in Caryophyllaceae.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe family Caryophyllaceae has traditionally been divided into three subfamilies (i.e. Alsinoideae, Caryophylloideae, Paronychioideae). However, the monophyly of each subfamily has been challenged, while boundaries, phylogenetic relationships, and divergence times of particular tribes and genera still remain to be inferred.
resultsOur plastome-derived phylogenies strongly support the monophyly of Caryophyllaceae with a dated crown age of ca. 56.4 Mya (Late Paleocene). While the three traditional subfamilies proved non-monophyletic, relationships among 11 previously recognized tribes were fully resolved. However, in contrast to earlier studies, we identified tribe Eremogoneae (represented by Eremogone griffithii) as sister to tribe Sileneae, and the monotypic genus Thylacospermum (T. caespitosum) as a member of Caryophylleae. BBM inferred that the ancestral states of Caryophyllaceae include: presence of stipules; free sepals; absence of petals; five stamens; and utricle or achene fruit.
conclusionsThis is the first comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Caryophyllaceae that strongly supports the subdivision of the family into 11 tribes. While the initial divergence of this family (ca. 56.4 Mya) may be associated with the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; ca. 55.5 Mya), tribes only started to diversify either during the Late Eocene (ca. 35.1-31.6 Mya) or, in particular, during the Late Oligocene to Mid-Miocene (25.5-15.5 Mya). This temporal coincidence suggests that the origin and diversification of many, if not the majority of Caryophyllaceae genera may have been shaped by global cooling and/or aridification events since the Mid-to-Late Miocene as well as the Pliocene-Pleistocene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.