ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Quality of Life Measurement in PARP Inhibitor Trials of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer - What Do We Know?
Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), dominated by high-grade serous carcinoma, continues to impose a heavy global burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Although advances in surgery and chemotherapy have extended survival, relapse within 2 years remains common, underscoring the need for novel strategies. Poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have transformed maintenance therapy by prolonging progression-free survival, yet their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is less well characterized. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) serve as key tools for evaluating the impact of treatment on physical, emotional, and social well-being. Trials including SOLO1, NOVA, and ARIEL3 demonstrate the increasing recognition of QoL endpoints, though heterogeneity in tools and endpoints limits cross-trial comparisons. Several gaps persist including limited data collection beyond disease progression. This review integrates evidence from published studies, highlights methodological challenges, and proposes directions for future work, emphasizing the centrality of patient-centered outcomes in advancing precision medicine for ovarian cancer. The evidence underscores the imperative of designing trials that incorporate QoL as a core endpoint, ensuring meaningful benefits for patients in both clinical and real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.