Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803563›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Lessons and Insights from a Case Study on Clinical Trial Fraud.

Courtney McGuire, Jenn W Sellers, Cheryl Grandinetti, Michele Fedowitz, Kassa Ayalew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Courtney McGuireOffice of Scientific Investigations (OSI), Office of Compliance (OC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, WO51, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA. courtney.mcguire@fda.hhs.gov.
Jenn W SellersOffice of Scientific Investigations (OSI), Office of Compliance (OC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, WO51, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Cheryl GrandinettiOffice of Scientific Investigations (OSI), Office of Compliance (OC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, WO51, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Michele FedowitzOffice of Scientific Investigations (OSI), Office of Compliance (OC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, WO51, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Kassa AyalewOffice of Scientific Investigations (OSI), Office of Compliance (OC), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave, WO51, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration Good Clinical Practice inspections play a critical role in safeguarding the rights, safety, and welfare of participants, verifying trial data, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Clinical trial fraud poses a serious threat to data integrity, undermines the reliability of regulatory decisions, and can jeopardize the protection of trial participants. This paper presents a case study of clinical trial fraud uncovered during preparations for a Food and Drug Administration inspection. It details the fraudulent activities committed, their impact on data integrity, and the consequences for the marketing application, and offers lessons learned and insights for preventing and detecting fraud in clinical trials. It emphasizes the application of Quality by Design principles by identifying critical factors that underpin clinical trial quality and designing and conducting the trials to protect those trial attributes. Additionally, it highlights the importance of risk-based strategies in monitoring, trial oversight, and the design and management of electronic systems. It also underscores the importance of reporting suspected clinical trial fraud to the Food and Drug Administration promptly. In this case, the Sponsor’s delay in reporting the fraudulent activities postponed the Food and Drug Administration’s investigation and ultimately extended the Prescription Drug User Fee Act timeline by three months.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFraudHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationClinical trial fraudData integrityGood clinical practice (GCP)U.S. FDA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.