SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Efficacy and safety of deferiprone for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of motor function and overall disease severity.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accumulation of iron in brain regions is one of the characteristics of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Deferiprone (DFP) is an iron chelator that reduces iron overaccumulation in certain diseases. The efficacy and safety of DFP in the management of PD have been assessed; however, the results remain controversial.
methodA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases to identify all randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcomes included changes in motor function (MDS-UPDRS III) and overall disease severity (MDS-UPDRS total score). Additionally, the safety of DFP was assessed by analyzing adverse events. A network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted.
resultsFour randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies included 567 patients with early–stage PD. The DFP doses across the included studies ranged from 3.75 to 15 mg/kg twice daily. None of the doses showed a significant Improvement in motor function (I2 = 0%), or in overall disease severity (I2 = 82.5%), compared with placebo in the network analysis. However, a non-significant improvement in motor function was observed at 7.5 mg/kg twice daily, whereas higher doses were associated with worsening clinical scores. Adverse events were generally mild, although there were some safety concerns at higher doses.
conclusionDFP can reduce accumulated iron across brain regions. However, current evidence does not support the use of DFP for the clinical and symptomatic management of PD within the assessed range of doses and treatment periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41803554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.