ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Breast edema score as a biomarker of tumor aggressiveness and its predictive value for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate MRI-based breast edema patterns as biomarkers of tumor aggressiveness and their predictive value for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 235 female patients (mean age, 52 ± 12 years) with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer who underwent pre-NAC breast MRI. After excluding 19 patients (10 for inadequate image quality, 9 for post-biopsy imaging), 216 patients were analyzed. Breast edema score (BES) was independently assessed by two radiology residents to evaluate interobserver agreement. Subsequently, a breast radiologist reviewed all cases to establish the definitive dataset. The differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups and between different BES were compared.
resultsInterobserver agreement for BES classification was very high (92.6% concordance). Edema presence correlated significantly with larger tumor size (p = 0.001), higher histological grade (p = 0.001), axillary lymph node metastasis (p = 0.015), hormone receptor negativity (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.031), and elevated Ki-67 (p = 0.001). Higher BES groups (BES 2-4) showed stronger associations with aggressive features: tumor size (p < 0.001), grade (p = 0.022), hormone receptor negativity (p = 0.001), non-luminal subtypes (p = 0.001), and intratumoral necrosis (p = 0.002). Neither edema nor BES predicted pathological response to NAC (p = 0.999, p = 0.299).
conclusionBES and edema are robust imaging biomarkers of tumor aggressiveness but demonstrate no predictive value for NAC response. MRI-based edema scoring holds clinical relevance for noninvasive tumor phenotyping and risk stratification in breast cancer management. KEY POINTS: Question Can MRI-based breast edema patterns predict tumor aggressiveness and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer patients, aiding noninvasive risk stratification? Findings BES correlates with aggressive tumor features (larger size, higher grade, hormone negativity; all p < 0.050 but shows no predictive value for NAC response (p = 0.299). Clinical relevance BES serves as a practical imaging biomarker for risk stratification and tumor phenotyping, guiding individualized therapy. However, it shows no utility in predicting NAC response, emphasizing the need for complementary predictive tools in treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41803553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.