Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803450›Full record

ArticleNature food2026

A framework for estimating manure nitrogen balance and recycling potential for current and future conditions in the USA.

Yanyu Wang, Xin Zhang, Sheri Spiegal, Eric A Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanyu WangAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-9822
Xin ZhangAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD, USA. xin.zhang@umces.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1619-1537
Sheri SpiegalUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-9512
Eric A DavidsonAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8525-8697

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) 2022 New Innovator AwardNational Science Foundation (NSF) CBET-2025826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manure recycling can ameliorate pollution and fertilizer demand, but varying assumptions about recoverable manure nutrients and crop requirements complicate understanding of manure recycling potential. Using nitrogen (N) in the contiguous USA as a case study, we applied methods from six studies to compare manure N balance estimates (recoverable manure minus crop demand). We then developed a framework to assess both current and future potentials of manure recycling. The current balance in the USA is -13.3 ± 1.1 TgN yr

Indexed as

ManureNitrogenRecyclingAgricultureAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersUnited StatesFertilizersManureNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID41803450
PMCPMC13021511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.