Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803448›Full record

ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Advances in computational prediction of RNA-small molecule binding affinity.

Stalin Arulsamy, Pinky Arora, Shubham Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stalin ArulsamySchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India.
Pinky AroraSchool of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India.
Shubham KumarSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar-Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India. shubhamm771@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burgeoning field of RNA-targeted drug discovery necessitates robust and accurate computational methods for predicting RNA-small molecule binding affinity. This review synthesizes recent advancements in deep learning and machine learning approaches, highlighting their methodologies, performance, and impact on accelerating drug design. We delve into methods that leverage diverse data representations, including sequence-based features, 3D structural information (voxel grids and molecular surfaces), and sophisticated graph-based networks. Key innovations such as contrastive learning, multi-scale feature extraction, and cross-fusion mechanisms are discussed, alongside their contributions to model robustness, generalization, and interpretability. We also consider the relative computational demands of these advanced models. Despite tremendous advancements, problems still exist, especially with regard to the lack of data because of the intrinsic flexibility of RNA structures and the inherent experimental difficulty in determining their structure and dynamic nature. The present state of computational RNA-small molecule affinity prediction is thoroughly reviewed in this article, along with important limits and future directions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyRNASmall Molecule LibrariesBinding SitesDeep LearningDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryGraph Neural NetworksHumansMachine LearningModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationRNASmall Molecule LibrariesBinding affinity predictionComputational drug designContrastive learningDeep learningGraph neural networksRNA-small molecule interactions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.