Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hybrid Aquila optimizer-Harris Hawks optimization for CNN hyperparameter tuning in brain tumor classification.

Manoj Kumar, Noor Mohd, G Shivam, Ankur Goyal, Deepak Parashar, Rijwan Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manoj KumarGraphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Noor MohdGraphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
G ShivamGraphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Ankur GoyalSymbiosis International Deemed University, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Deepak ParasharManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. deepak.parashar@manipal.edu.
Rijwan KhanMarwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is hard to categorize properly in terms of interclass similarity, there is data imbalance, and sensitive clinical decision-making: but the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) highly relies on effective, yet computationally costly, hyperparameter tuning. To find solutions to such issues, the given paper proposes a hybrid solution to the problems of the Aquila Optimizer and Harris Hawks Optimization, i.e., Aquila Optimizer-Harris Hawks Optimization (AO-HHO) framework, to integrate the positive qualities of extremely good global exploration of the Aquila Optimizer and the good local exploitation process of a Harris Hawks Optimization to achieve balanced and robust CNN hyperparameter optimization. On a publicly accessible dataset of 7, 023 brain MRI images divided into glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and non-tumor, the proposed algorithm has been tested on with fine-tuning critical hyperparameters, such as learning rate, batch size, number of filters, dropout rate, and optimizer type. The rate of accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of the AO-HHO-tuned CNN is invariably high than the conventional metaheuristic algorithms, including the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) that are approximately 78-83. The proposed method also helps in reducing the cost of computing. It takes only 77.85 s to train, while the baseline optimizers take more than 300 s. This shows that AO-HHO is a reliable, accurate, and computationally efficient framework that can be used for medical imaging decision-support applications that need to be done in real time and with limited resources.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansSoft ComputingArithmetic Optimization AlgorithmBrain Tumor ClassificationHarris Hawks OptimizationHybrid Metaheuristic OptimizationMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41803423
PMCPMC13096634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.