ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid Aquila optimizer-Harris Hawks optimization for CNN hyperparameter tuning in brain tumor classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aquila Optimization-Assisted Artificial Neural Network for Classification Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- BrainFusionNet: an attention-augmented deep convolutional framework with hybrid loss optimisation and test-time augmentation for multi-class brain tumour detection in magnetic resonance images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is hard to categorize properly in terms of interclass similarity, there is data imbalance, and sensitive clinical decision-making: but the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) highly relies on effective, yet computationally costly, hyperparameter tuning. To find solutions to such issues, the given paper proposes a hybrid solution to the problems of the Aquila Optimizer and Harris Hawks Optimization, i.e., Aquila Optimizer-Harris Hawks Optimization (AO-HHO) framework, to integrate the positive qualities of extremely good global exploration of the Aquila Optimizer and the good local exploitation process of a Harris Hawks Optimization to achieve balanced and robust CNN hyperparameter optimization. On a publicly accessible dataset of 7, 023 brain MRI images divided into glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and non-tumor, the proposed algorithm has been tested on with fine-tuning critical hyperparameters, such as learning rate, batch size, number of filters, dropout rate, and optimizer type. The rate of accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of the AO-HHO-tuned CNN is invariably high than the conventional metaheuristic algorithms, including the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) that are approximately 78-83. The proposed method also helps in reducing the cost of computing. It takes only 77.85 s to train, while the baseline optimizers take more than 300 s. This shows that AO-HHO is a reliable, accurate, and computationally efficient framework that can be used for medical imaging decision-support applications that need to be done in real time and with limited resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.