ArticleScientific reports2026
General-practitioner-centered health care: current results from the implementation of the German model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary care-centered healthcare models, particularly those led by general practitioners (GPs), are increasingly adopted to address global healthcare challenges including rising costs, fragmented services, and chronic disease burdens. In Germany, the “Hausarztzentrierte Versorgung” (English: General Practitioner-Centered Health Care, GPCHC) program aims to reinforce the role of GPs as care coordinators. Within this study we evaluated data from the implemented German GPCHC model in Baden-Württemberg, a German federal State with about 11 Mio inhabitants and compared outcomes with international benchmarks for strong primary care. The analysis is based on administrative health insurance data of almost two million individuals. We compared patients enrolled in GPCHC with patients receiving regular primary care in 2022 in terms of key indicators of healthcare utilization (GP contacts, uncoordinated consultations with a non-GP-specialist, all-cause hospitalizations, potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAHs), and prescription of me-too drugs. For patients enrolled in the GPCHC program, consistently favorable outcomes were observed with respect to these key indicators. These findings align with international evidence from strong primary care systems in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Nordic countries. The proposed model presents a scalable framework for strengthening primary care delivery in complex healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.