ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Automatic pose estimation in newborn infants: Lessons from the Baby Grow study.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Movement-Related Differences Between Infants with High and Low Likelihood of Autism: A Longitudinal Study Using Markerless Motion Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Automated Framework for Pose-Sequence Analysis of Spontaneous Movements in Preterm Infants.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in computational techniques-particularly machine learning-have expanded opportunities to analyse early infant motor repertoires, especially in naturalistic settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strengths, limitations, and performance of state-of-the-art pose estimation algorithms in challenging, home-based video conditions. We analysed 22 videos recorded by parents using mobile phones from eight newborns in the Baby Grow study, at 2, 4, and 8 weeks of age. The videos varied in clothing (common onesie, babygrow, vest), background (grey, black, coloured), lighting (with/without shadows), and camera angles (top, front, bottom). From these, 2,640 frames were extracted and manually annotated to serve as ground truth. We tested demo versions of MediaPipe, OpenPose, PCT, RTMpose, Sapiens, and VitPose, and evaluated performance using object keypoint similarity (OKS), percentage of correct keypoints (PCKh), speed, and accuracy. RTMpose showed the highest overall accuracy, while MediaPipe had the fastest processing speed. However, when balancing speed and accuracy at ratios of 70:30, 50:50, and 30:70, MediaPipe's speed compensated for its lower accuracy, making it a strong candidate for practical applications. Model performance varied under different environmental conditions, with RTMpose, Sapiens, and VitPose being the most robust. As infant movement research increasingly shifts to real-world environments, selecting appropriate models and ensuring video quality are essential. Our findings show that (1) new models outperform legacy tools like OpenPose, and (2) video context and model selection significantly affect pose estimation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.