Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803411›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Automatic pose estimation in newborn infants: Lessons from the Baby Grow study.

Mohammad Saber Sotoodeh, Ori Ossmy, Georgina Donati, Jazmine Hall, Hannah Rowan, Gillian S Forrester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Automated Framework for Pose-Sequence Analysis of Spontaneous Movements in Preterm Infants.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Saber SotoodehSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. m.saber.s@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-8393
Ori OssmyCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development and School of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Georgina DonatiCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development and School of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Jazmine HallCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development and School of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Hannah RowanSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Gillian S ForresterSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

Simons Foundation 986348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in computational techniques-particularly machine learning-have expanded opportunities to analyse early infant motor repertoires, especially in naturalistic settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strengths, limitations, and performance of state-of-the-art pose estimation algorithms in challenging, home-based video conditions. We analysed 22 videos recorded by parents using mobile phones from eight newborns in the Baby Grow study, at 2, 4, and 8 weeks of age. The videos varied in clothing (common onesie, babygrow, vest), background (grey, black, coloured), lighting (with/without shadows), and camera angles (top, front, bottom). From these, 2,640 frames were extracted and manually annotated to serve as ground truth. We tested demo versions of MediaPipe, OpenPose, PCT, RTMpose, Sapiens, and VitPose, and evaluated performance using object keypoint similarity (OKS), percentage of correct keypoints (PCKh), speed, and accuracy. RTMpose showed the highest overall accuracy, while MediaPipe had the fastest processing speed. However, when balancing speed and accuracy at ratios of 70:30, 50:50, and 30:70, MediaPipe's speed compensated for its lower accuracy, making it a strong candidate for practical applications. Model performance varied under different environmental conditions, with RTMpose, Sapiens, and VitPose being the most robust. As infant movement research increasingly shifts to real-world environments, selecting appropriate models and ensuring video quality are essential. Our findings show that (1) new models outperform legacy tools like OpenPose, and (2) video context and model selection significantly affect pose estimation accuracy.

Indexed as

PostureAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMaleMotion CaptureVideo RecordingBiomechanicsComputer visionGeneral movementMarkerless motion trackingMotor development

Identifiers

PMID41803411
PMCPMC12971853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.