ArticleScientific reports2026
Opportunistic screening data for early prediction of GDM in Northern Chinese women: a multicenter machine learning study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a machine learning model for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using routinely available first-trimester clinical and ultrasound data in Northern Chinese women. This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled pregnant women from three hospitals in Northern China. We integrated first-trimester maternal characteristics and standardized ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral (VAT) adipose tissue thickness. After addressing potential selection bias via inverse probability weighting, we employed a genetic algorithm (GA) for robust feature selection and evaluated five machine learning classifiers (XGBoost, ANN, SVM, MLR, RF). Model performance was assessed on an internal test set and an independent external validation set, with AUC as the primary metric. The GA consistently selected BMI, SAT, and VAT as core predictive features. The model combining GA-selected features with XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an AUC of 0.962 on the internal test set and 0.878 on the external validation set, with corresponding sensitivities of 0.90 and 0.70, and specificities of 0.942 and 0.935, respectively. It significantly outperformed models using other feature selection methods or classifiers (all P < 0.001). The model exhibited robust stability across various sensitivity analyses. A machine learning model based on readily accessible first-trimester indicators provides an effective tool for early, opportunistic GDM risk stratification in Northern Chinese women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.