ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Multimodal deep learning for objective skill assessment in robot-assisted vesico-urethral anastomosis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The learning curve of robotic esophagectomy: a systematic review with a proposed training and competency assessment framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to classify robot-assisted surgery (RAS) skill levels (inexperienced, competent, and experienced) during performance of vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) using multimodal physiological signals. We trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models on data collected from 23 RAS (RAS trainees and experienced surgeons) performing two VUAs on animal tissue. The dataset included 116-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) and 20 eye-tracking signals recorded during two VUA subtasks: (1) needle grasping, positioning, and entry; and (2) needle driving with wrist rotation and suture pull-out. Skill levels were rated by three raters using the Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE) tool. Hyperparameters of the models were tuned using grid search with group 4-fold cross-validation on 16 participants and final model performance was evaluated on data from 7 unseen (held-out test) participants, repeated over 10 iterations. Weighted F-scores for classifying skill level using EEG and eye-tracking data were 0.84 for subtask 1 and 0.89 for subtask 2. Using paired t-tests, high-density EEG (116 channels) significantly outperformed low-density EEG (32 channels) for subtask 1 (p = 0.001), with no difference for subtask 2 (p = 0.15). Adding eye-tracking data significantly improved classification for subtask 2 (p = 0.001), but not for subtask 1 (p = 0.5). Multimodal deep learning using EEG and eye-tracking data enabled objective classification of surgical skills during VUA. The benefits of high-density EEG and multimodal integration were task-dependent, underscoring the need to tailor assessment tools to the cognitive and sensorimotor demands of specific surgical subtasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.