Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics.

Mengsi Hu, Xia Li, Huihui Wang, Yuezhong Zhang, Ximing Wang, Jikai Liu, Zhenxia Mu, Peixian Gao, Xiufeng Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengsi Hu *Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Xia Li *Department of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China.
Huihui WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China. wenddywang@126.com.
Yuezhong ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China. zhangyuezhong@sdfmu.edu.cn.
Ximing WangDepartment of Imaging, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jikai LiuKey Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture (Ministry of Education), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zhenxia MuDepartment of Imaging, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Peixian GaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xiufeng SongDepartment of Dermatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong, First Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

Funding

Key R&D Program (Soft Science Project) of Shandong Province, China Grant No. 2022CXGC010504Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province Grant No. ZR2022MH227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard assessment of coarctation of aorta (CoA) was achieved invasively by cardiac catheterization, which is associated with several risks including radiation exposure. The present study aimed to validate a multimodal imaging-based non-invasive computational framework for assessment of trans-coarctation pressure gradients (PG) in patients with severe coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Here we developed a non-invasive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling framework based on multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and ultrasound-derived input parameters, which incorporated into a lumped parameter model (LPM) and validated the results against measurements obtained via cardiac catheterization, both preoperatively and postoperatively. We used conventional Doppler estimates to make these correlations and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical PG. The results indicated that for 18 patients with severe CoA the CFD simulation exhibited better concordance and correlation with catheter measurements compared to Doppler gradients (pre-intervention: 58.44 ± 17.77 vs. 55.72 ± 19.71 vs.57.78 ± 18.02 mmHg; post-intervention: 17.94 ± 10.54 vs. 15.65 ± 5.15 vs.20.61 ± 7.43 mmHg). Specifically, the CFD-derived PG showed a stronger correlation with catheter measurements (pre-intervention r = 0.89, post-intervention r = 0.90) than did Doppler-derived PG (pre-intervention r = 0.71, post-intervention r = 0.30). This CFD framework facilitated reliable quantification of PG and visualization of hemodynamic forces in patient-specific geometric models, and suggesting its potential as a non-invasive and effective approach for the assessment of CoA.

Indexed as

Aortic CoarctationHemodynamicsHydrodynamicsMultimodal ImagingCardiac CatheterizationComputed Tomography AngiographyComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyAorta coarctationCoAComputational fluid dynamicsDopplerMDCTAPGPressure gradient

Identifiers

PMID41803378
PMCPMC13087193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.