ArticleScientific reports2026
Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital heart defects - diagnosis and treatment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Case Report: Dual molecular diagnosis in complex congenital heart disease in an Ecuadorian patient with supravalvar aortic stenosis and pulmonary valve stenosis carrying pathogenic variants inFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gold standard assessment of coarctation of aorta (CoA) was achieved invasively by cardiac catheterization, which is associated with several risks including radiation exposure. The present study aimed to validate a multimodal imaging-based non-invasive computational framework for assessment of trans-coarctation pressure gradients (PG) in patients with severe coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Here we developed a non-invasive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling framework based on multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and ultrasound-derived input parameters, which incorporated into a lumped parameter model (LPM) and validated the results against measurements obtained via cardiac catheterization, both preoperatively and postoperatively. We used conventional Doppler estimates to make these correlations and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical PG. The results indicated that for 18 patients with severe CoA the CFD simulation exhibited better concordance and correlation with catheter measurements compared to Doppler gradients (pre-intervention: 58.44 ± 17.77 vs. 55.72 ± 19.71 vs.57.78 ± 18.02 mmHg; post-intervention: 17.94 ± 10.54 vs. 15.65 ± 5.15 vs.20.61 ± 7.43 mmHg). Specifically, the CFD-derived PG showed a stronger correlation with catheter measurements (pre-intervention r = 0.89, post-intervention r = 0.90) than did Doppler-derived PG (pre-intervention r = 0.71, post-intervention r = 0.30). This CFD framework facilitated reliable quantification of PG and visualization of hemodynamic forces in patient-specific geometric models, and suggesting its potential as a non-invasive and effective approach for the assessment of CoA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.