Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803376›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hypergraph-based contrastive embedding and attention fusion for detection of skin cancer.

Tathagat Banerjee, Prachi Chhabra, Manoj Kumar, Abhay Kumar, Kumar Abhishek, B M Ahamed Shafeeq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tathagat BanerjeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar, India.
Prachi ChhabraDepartment of Information Technology, JSS Academy of Technical education Noida, Noida, India.
Manoj KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India.
Abhay KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, NIT Patna, Patna, Bihar, 800005, India.
Kumar AbhishekDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, NIT Patna, Patna, Bihar, 800005, India.
B M Ahamed ShafeeqManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. ahamed.shafeeq@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin diseases involve a spectrum of problems including infections, and malignancies. Melanoma, the deadliest kind of skin cancer, starts in melanocytes, which make melanin. Early detection is really important, but it’s hard since the visual indications are often quite little and there is a big class imbalance in diagnostic datasets. The proposed C2G-HFMTA framework consists of three hierarchical levels: (a) an overall contrastive learning (CL) framework, (b)two major feature learning branches, namely the Graph Contrastive Embedding Framework (GCEF) and the High-dimensional Feature with Multimodal Transformer Attention (HFMTA), and (c) attention and fusion sub-modules including Hypergraph Bi-Convolutional Attention and Multiscale Transformer Attention, which operate within these branches to enhance discriminative representation learning. The proposed method demonstrates strong performance on benchmark dermoscopic datasets and has the potential to support computer-aided diagnosis systems, subject to further may support future computer-aided diagnosis systems validation and real-world testing. We have used Clustered Class-Based Segmentation (CCBS) for changing the training distributions. Our Class-Based Contrastive Loss (CBCL) works directly on original dermoscopic pictures, that preserves the semantic integrity of the images while making it easier to tell the difference between classes. Our framework outperforms several recent CNN- and transformer-based baselines in controlled experimental settings. It gets 93.2% accuracy and a 92.9% F1-score, and it does well on minority classes. Experiments were conducted on the HAM10000 dataset containing 10,015 dermoscopic images across seven diagnostic categories, using a stratified train–validation–test split of 70%–10%–20%. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, using five-fold stratified cross-validation to ensure robust performance estimation. Ablation experiments show that grouping, cross-branch fusion, and semantic-guided attention are important.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDermoscopyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41803376
PMCPMC13096346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.