Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803344›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A behaviour-adaptive AI assistant enhancing accessibility and usability for blind users through real-time interaction personalization.

Shabbab Ali Algamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shabbab Ali AlgamdiDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia. s.algamdi@psau.edu.sa.

Funding

This study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University under the project number (PSAU/2025/R/1446)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with visual disabilities are still struggling when using the modern AI-driven system as most current assistive technologies are based on a static paradigm of interaction that fails to adjust to the behaviour of individual users. Recent developments on large language models (LLMs) present even more chances in the sphere of accessibility, though their combination with adaptive, behaviour-sensitive interaction is under-researched. This study presents AURA (Adaptive User-Responsive Assistant), an accessibility system based on voice that integrates an interaction based on LLM with personalization based on real-time behaviour. The speech rate, verbosity and language complexity are dynamically modified by AURA in response to behavioural cues through replay actions, skips, and length of time listening, allowing within-session adaptation. The proposed approach was evaluated through an exploratory, simulation-based study using representative behavioural profiles to examine the system’s adaptation capability under controlled conditions. Quantitative results indicate that behaviour-aware personalization can reduce replay and skip events, improve interaction efficiency, and reliably converge toward intended interaction profiles when compared to a non-adaptive baseline. These results are made as initial, evidence-of-concept, which indicates the possibility of integrating LLM-based interaction and behaviour-sensitive adaptation in accessibility-focused systems. While the current study does not involve human participants, it establishes a conceptual and technical foundation for future research. Ongoing and future work will focus on human-subject evaluation with blind and visually impaired users, in-the-wild deployment, and extension to more complex conversational and multilingual accessibility scenarios.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBlindnessPersons with Visual DisabilitiesHumansIntelligent SystemsLarge Language ModelsUser-Computer InterfaceAdaptive accessibilityBehaviour-aware systems and personalized interactionBlind usersLarge language models (LLMs)Usability

Identifiers

PMID41803344
PMCPMC13087224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.