Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803342›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2026

Physical activity for public health in the 21st century.

Deborah Salvo, Inacio Crochemore-Silva, Andrea Wendt, Jakob Tarp, Eric J Shiroma, Richard J Simpson, I-Min Lee, Ulf Ekelund, Ester Cerin, Youssouf Keita and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The whole day matters, but so do living conditions: reframing the 24-hour movement through an equity lens.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. OralNutrients · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The physical activity health paradox: what is it, why might it happen, and where to go from here?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Deborah SalvoPeople, Health, and Place Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. dsalvo@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9726-0882
Inacio Crochemore-SilvaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, and Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Andrea WendtGraduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Jakob TarpOslo Research Centre for Physical Activity and Population Health, Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Eric J ShiromaDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard J SimpsonSchool of Nutritional Sciences and Wellness; Department of Pediatrics; Department of Immunobiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
I-Min LeeDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1083-6907
Ulf EkelundOslo Research Centre for Physical Activity and Population Health, Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Ester CerinMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-165X
Youssouf KeitaGlobal Financing Facility, World Bank, Bamako, Mali.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2862-2858
Adrian BaumanThe Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Pedro C HallalDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Andrea Ramirez VarelaDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael PrattHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-7715
Rodrigo ReisPeople Health and Place Unit, Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Erica HincksonSchool of Sport and Recreation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-7830
Ding DingDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-9224
Harold W KohlPeople, Health, and Place Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
James SallisHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over 5 million attributed deaths per year, physical inactivity is a major global public health issue. Although the importance of physical activity is well recognized within the scope of obesity and cardiometabolic disease prevention and control, its broader benefits for the health of individuals and societies are yet to be fully harnessed. Furthermore, the role of active leisure, active transport and active labor-primary domains of physical activity-in supporting or hindering social and health equity has been largely overlooked. Here we (1) used a health equity lens to describe global domain-specific physical activity inequalities through an analysis of World Health Organization STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (WHO STEPS) data from 68 countries; (2) summarized evidence linking physical activity with health outcomes beyond cardiometabolic disease, including immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer; and (3) developed a new model reconceptualizing physical activity to better respond to 21st-century public health challenges. Our global, intersectional analysis of gender and socioeconomic physical activity inequalities revealed a 40-percentage-point gap in active leisure-the only domain consistently driven by choice-between historically privileged groups (wealthy men in high-income countries) and historically disadvantaged ones (poor women in low-income countries). Robust evidence supports the benefits of physical activity for immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer. Our reconceptualized model recognizes the influence of social identities, norms, policies and structures on physical activity for health and wellbeing and emphasizes the urgent need to develop and roll out policies and programs that disseminate and harness the full benefits of physical activity for human, societal and planetary health.

Indexed as

ExerciseGlobal HealthPublic HealthSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsObesityRisk FactorsWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID41803342
PMCPMC13099635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.