ArticleScientific reports2026
Water quality index and human health risk analysis in urban drinking water sources.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Water Quality Index: Physicochemical and Microbiological Risk Assessment of Drinking Water in Maya City, Eastern Ethiopia.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study was conducted to assess the quality of drinking water in urban areas of Hafizabad and Pindi Bhattian through the Water Quality Index (WQI) and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA). Forty-eight samples were collected from four sources of drinking water, including filter plants, tube wells, tap water, and bore wells. Water samples were analyzed for physical, chemical, and biological parameters. Results for all the parameters were compared with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Results showed that temperature, turbidity, and electrical conductivity frequently exceeded WHO guidelines, while pH was within its allowable range. The chemical parameters, such as dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, total hardness, and calcium hardness met WHO guidelines. However, E. coli was found higher than both WHO guidelines and National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS) in tap water samples. Arsenic concentration was also higher than standards in tap water of Hafizabad. According to WQI, several urban sources, particularly tap water, had a very poor or unfit class for drinking purposes. HHRA found arsenic to have both non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks for adults and children. These findings highlight the need for improved treatment, distribution-system integrity, and routine monitoring to reduce long-term health risks in urban and peri-urban settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.