ArticleScientific reports2026
Axes of self-motion and object motion shape how we perceive world-relative motion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When we move through the environment, the direction of objects in the optic array changes, producing an optic flow. To perceive world-relative object motion during self-motion, complex flow vectors are decomposed during a process called flow parsing. The real world and realistic VR environments contain abundant depth and distance cues, including size and binocular disparities. When targets move in various directions, the distance signals potentially aid in the flow parsing process. We designed two experiments with our wide-field stereoscopic environment. Participants observed target motions during visually simulated self-motion and indicated the direction of target motion with respect to a scene depicting a large room (Experiment 1) or a cluster of 3D objects (Experiment 2). Forward-backward and left-right target motions, as well as self-motions were simulated. Optic flow and motion vectors were controlled across conditions to examine cues to target distance and motion in depth, such as binocular disparity and object size, and the change in these signals (e.g. looming, change in disparity, interocular velocity difference). During left-right locomotion through both environments, flow parsing gains were significantly lower for left-right than for forward-backward moving targets. However, during forward-backward locomotion, left-right moving targets yielded significantly higher flow parsing gains than forward-backward moving targets. Overall, flow parsing gains were higher when self-motion and target motion are orthogonal to each other, than when they are parallel. These findings provide evidence that depth and distance cues are integrated in perceiving world-relative object motion during self motion. Availability of such signals improves the effectiveness of flow parsing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.