Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting circRNA subcellular localization by fusing circRNA sequence and network information.

Lei Chen, Jinghai Hu, Bo Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China. chen_lei1@163.com.
Jinghai HuCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China.
Bo ZhouSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CircRNAs have attracted more and more attentions in recent years as they play important roles in many biological processes. It is essential for determining the functions of circRNAs. The subcellular localizations of circRNAs are deemed to be related to their functions. Thus, it is necessary to determine the subcellular localizations of circRNAs. The traditional biochemical experiments are expensive and time-consuming in determining subcellular localizations of circRNAs. It is an alternative way to design computation models. In this study, a new computational model, namely CircLoc, was designed to predict subcellular localizations of circRNAs. This model employed circRNA sequences and networks, from which circRNA features were extracted through both traditional methods (e.g. k-mer), large language model (RNAErnie), and network representation learning algorithms (e.g. node2vec, graph attention auto-encoder). All features were processed by a self-attention layer and fed into a fully connected layer to make predictions. The model was evaluated by ten-fold cross-validation, yielding average AUC and AUPR of 0.7856 and 0.4055, respectively. Such performance was better than that of the models using traditional multi-label classification algorithms and the miRNA subcellular localization prediction models. The reasonableness of CircLoc was also elaborated using ablation tests. The CircLoc was effective in predicting circRNA subcellular localizations and can be a latent useful tool in circRNA study.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyRNA, CircularAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansRNA, CircularCircRNAGraph attention auto-encoderNode2vecSubcellular localization

Identifiers

PMID41803305
PMCPMC13096291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.