ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable dual-attention transformer for predicting the sociocultural impact of global sports events.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing research on sociocultural analytics in global sports has primarily relied on traditional statistical and regression-based approaches that capture limited linear relationships among cultural, economic, and sentiment-related variables. However, the societal influence of international sporting events emerges from complex, nonlinear interactions that require more expressive modeling frameworks. This study proposes a Sociocultural Dual-Attention TabTransformer (SC-DATransformer) to predict a continuous Social Impact Score, defined as a normalized composite index derived from validated indicators including cultural engagement, diversity, gender representation, public sentiment, sustainability, and media coverage. The empirical analysis is conducted on a structured dataset comprising approximately 70,000 event-level observations described by 21 variables, covering multiple global competitions across regions and years. To enhance representation quality and reduce redundancy, feature engineering and selection techniques such as mutual information and dimensionality reduction are employed. Model performance is evaluated against established baselines using complementary regression metrics, supported by 95% bootstrap confidence intervals and Diebold–Mariano statistical testing. Within the experimental setting, the proposed model demonstrates improved predictive consistency and lower error magnitudes relative to baseline approaches. Explainable AI analysis further provides transparent insight into dominant sociocultural drivers influencing impact estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.