ReviewNature protocols2026
Preparation of targeted lipid nanoparticles for precision nucleic acid delivery.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytokine co-presentation on targeted lipid nanoparticles enhances in vivo T cell engineering.Biomaterials · 2027Article
- Ultrahigh-DAR antibody-drug conjugates: advancing the next generation of targeted therapy.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- Rewiring immunity with in vivo CAR T cell engineering.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Resolving Heterogeneity of Targeted Lipid Nanoparticles Through Solution-Based Biophysical Analyses.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Functionalized Lipid Nanoparticles for Targeted RNA Delivery in Immune and Inflammatory Diseases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Resolving heterogeneity of targeted lipid nanoparticles through solution-based biophysical analyses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous administration of lipid nanoparticles for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics remains constrained by passive uptake mechanisms in the liver, often necessitating high doses to achieve meaningful transfection in specific cells of interest. Targeted LNPs (tLNPs) can overcome these challenges by (i) enabling receptor-mediated endocytosis in difficult-to-transfect cells, thereby reducing passive clearance; (ii) increasing the proportion of LNPs reaching their intended target; and (iii) enabling comparable protein expression at lower doses. Here, we provide a step-by-step guide for formulating tLNPs functionalized with whole antibodies or antibody fragments using traditional laboratory equipment. We outline procedures for antibody preparation and labeling (0.5-1 d), antibody-LNP conjugation (1-2 d), tLNP purification and characterization (1 d) and in vivo and ex vivo targeting evaluation (3-4 d). To demonstrate the versatility of this protocol, we validate in vivo targeting to two mouse tissues: we show that anti-platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 antibody conjugation to lung-tropic LNPs enhances lung transfection by five times compared to nontargeted LNPs, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody conjugation to liver-tropic LNPs enhances liver transfection by 20 times. We also demonstrate ex vivo targeting to primary human T cells, where anti-CD5 antibody conjugation to LNPs boosts uptake by 4.5 times and significantly increases mRNA transfection. Importantly, this modular strategy is compatible with any LNP formulation or antibody. In outlining these procedures, we seek to deliver a robust and reproducible workflow for the manufacturing of tLNPs, with the ultimate goal of advancing their therapeutic potential and facilitating clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41803280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.